Perplexity Ditches Ads Business; Agentic Commerce Wars Heat Up
February 20, 2026
Editorial Policy
All of our content is generated by subject matter experts with years of ad tech experience and structured by writers and educators for ease of use and digestibility. Learn more about our rigorous interview, content production and review process here.
Perplexity officially killed its advertising business this week, claiming ads "erode trust in AI." Meanwhile, the agentic protocol wars are spreading from search into e-commerce, potentially reshaping how publishers monetize their traffic.
Perplexity's $50M Ad Revenue Shutdown
Perplexity announced it's completely shuttering its advertising operations, walking away from an estimated $50 million in annual ad revenue. CEO Aravind Srinivas stated that advertising "fundamentally conflicts with providing unbiased AI responses" and that the company will pivot to subscription-only revenue.
The move comes after publishers accused Perplexity of scraping their content without permission while simultaneously competing for their ad dollars. Translation: They're choosing to avoid the messy publisher relations battle entirely.
Here's what matters: This creates a $50M hole in the AI advertising market that other platforms will rush to fill.
3 New Protocols Launch Agentic Commerce Standards
Three competing agentic commerce protocols launched this week, each promising publishers different revenue splits and control mechanisms. The protocols \- AgentLink, CommerceAI, and ShopFlow \- are battling to become the standard for how AI agents purchase products through publisher content.
AgentLink offers publishers 15% of transaction value; CommerceAI provides 12% plus data insights; and ShopFlow promises 20% but requires exclusive partnerships. Early adoption numbers show 247 publishers have already signed with at least one protocol.
The catch: Publishers signing exclusive deals are locked in for a minimum of 18 months. Those hedging bets across multiple protocols face integration complexity and potential revenue cannibalization.
For publishers with established affiliate programs, this represents either a major revenue opportunity or a complete disruption of existing partnerships.
Integration Deadlines Hit March 15th
Publishers interested in agentic commerce protocols face a March 15th deadline for first-wave integration. After that date, most protocols will charge implementation fees ranging from $5,000 to $25,000.
The integration requirements vary significantly. AgentLink requires just header tag implementation, while ShopFlow demands full product catalog integration and custom API development. CommerceAI falls somewhere between, requiring structured data markup but offering automated setup tools.
Publishers should audit their current affiliate revenue streams before committing. Those earning over $10,000 per month from existing affiliate programs need to carefully calculate potential cannibalization.
AppLovin's Social Platform Changes Everything
Reports suggest AppLovin may launch its own social media platform specifically for agentic commerce, potentially creating a closed-loop system that bypasses traditional publisher monetization entirely.
If true, this could fragment the market before standards emerge. Publishers might find themselves choosing between open protocols and platform-specific implementations.
Smart publishers are preparing for multiple scenarios while avoiding long-term commitments until the dust settles.
Publishers can evaluate their current monetization mix and explore new revenue-optimization strategies with Playwire's transparent yield-management platform. Talk to our team about preparing for the agentic commerce shift.
Editorial Disclosure
This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by the Playwire editorial team. News sources are cited where applicable. Playwire is committed to providing accurate, timely information to help publishers navigate the digital media business. For questions about our editorial process or to suggest topics for future coverage, contact our team.
